<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbon Capture and Storage: A Very Expensive Silver Bullet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://energybusinessdaily.com/energy-efficiency/carbon-capture-and-storage-a-very-expensive-silver-bullet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://energybusinessdaily.com/energy-efficiency/carbon-capture-and-storage-a-very-expensive-silver-bullet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:40:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: STEVEN SCHULTZ</title>
		<link>http://energybusinessdaily.com/energy-efficiency/carbon-capture-and-storage-a-very-expensive-silver-bullet/comment-page-1/#comment-2723</link>
		<dc:creator>STEVEN SCHULTZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energybusinessdaily.com/?p=3623#comment-2723</guid>
		<description>Electro Reduction (E.R.C) of CO2 is cheaper, quicker and more environmental friendly. It is ready NOW! Why is it that governments, private industry and news services are not touting THIS method over the poor CCS choice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Electro Reduction (E.R.C) of CO2 is cheaper, quicker and more environmental friendly. It is ready NOW! Why is it that governments, private industry and news services are not touting THIS method over the poor CCS choice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
